national morality

     To the sexually immoral person, society should be asking, “What do you think is sexually immoral?”  Why?  Because whoever is at the bottom of the social ladder is the person or persons who decide where the bottom of the social ladder is.  If we allow certain behaviors to be accepted and made socially acceptable—behaviors which heretofore have not been socially acceptable—then we are giving the power to decide what is moral or what is immoral sexually to whoever is elevated into those positions.  Therefore, it behooves society to ask such people this question: “What do you think is sexually immoral?”  When society asks such questions of those who are sexually immoral, we need to carefully listen to them and to take note of their responses.  If the general answer to that question is, “Nothing,” for example, then we need to realize that we are being bamboozled, that we are being taken for a ride; that we are being taken for granted.  If they have a particular sexual behavior which offends them, then society’s follow-up question to them should be, “You say that you don’t want us to discriminate against you, and yet you are discriminating against those members of our society who behave in that way which offends you.”  Can’t you see the hypocrisy in their objections to morality? 

     This is also true of our political leadership who say that they don’t believe in discrimination against this sexual behavior or that sexual behavior.  The question which we should be asking them is: “Well, then, what sexual behavior do you believe should be discriminated against?”  I use their expression, “discriminating against”—not my own.   Should they answer “none,” then society’s response should be to kick them out of office.  Clearly, they are ushering in the promotion of a sexually immoral system that will destroy this country and the lives of our children.  Again, another question should be raised: “Why are you representing the American people at all if you don’t believe that anything is sexually immoral?  Whose side are you on, anyway?” 

     Don’t you see how hypocritical this all is, for a political person to state that they don’t believe in discrimination against this form of sexual behavior or that form of sexual behavior?  What they are not telling you is which form of sexual behavior they do discriminate against.  There has to be some form of sexual behavior that they do discriminate against.  Then what form of sexual behavior do they discriminate against?  This is the question which should be raised by society to their representatives.  Society has a right to know the answer to this question.  Society has a right to ask these questions and to get truthful answers to these questions from their political leadership.  Clearly, as a society, we have not thought these issues through, nor have our representatives thought these issues through. 

     The recent political actions are not about discrimination at all, they are about feel-good sentimentality.  The recent political actions in regards to the sexual behavior of our citizens are not about stopping discrimination.  They are not about discrimination at all; they are about money and power.